I hiss, you laugh… we have different ways of expressing the same thing.
The same thing, the same thing. This is where we are all having a problem, the same thing, we don’t want to be the same thing, a thing wishes to persist as what it is and not as another. Why then, against all subjective and valid knowledge for persistence do I make a foolish attempt to instigate belief in universal homogeneous hegemony?
The difference is that persistence is a local event, things act greatest at their locality, they also influence themselves greatest at their locality. Hence the inability of most things to see beyond themselves. We are clouded by our personalized atmosphere, which distorts all externals. The self is a very crowded place, most beings suffocate within their own confines; in a lifetime few ever manage to escape the gravity of self! Yet the act by which we all lock out the external world is a common act, it is universal, even as it is local in nature. Here are all these creatures, things, subjects, essences, raging and boasting their individuality en mass. They are approximately successful at it within the confines of self. Once you get out of that personalized world you begin to realize that replication is the most common thing in the universe, and that it is by way of replication that the universe holds itself together, and that likes, likes are mandatory structures for any, any type of desire to manifest itself into existence! In blunt summary, if there were not already someone here like you, you would not be here. There has to be another like you to give you a hand to bridge the abyss between your desire to exist and the simmering nothingness.
But of course the universe and everything in it is dynamic, when the fabric of the universe alters, it alters you, it alters everything, and yet so it continues by that very process to be the same en mass. This is no different than the ironic fact that within you is the potential ability of desire to compose any aspect of the universe. You are your current aspect of the universe because you so desired it, difficult as that might seem to you. Of course everything around you had to be in absent-minded agreement, your surroundings share your desire by way of happenstance, neither you nor your environment could have known that you were ideally suited for each other, nor that you would all labor in cohort to concoct your reality. Still that is precisely what happened, you only divine reason and cause from effect, but the effect is negligent of the reason and the cause, neither are necessary nor do they exist from the perspective of the universe.
It may help you here if I note that even physicists have come to the conclusion that there is absolutely no difference between matter and energy; if that is the case, may I remind you that everything in the universe is between matter and energy.
When we divine the universe we construct it within the scope of ourselves; this is because we have no other methodology available to us, we may have once been different aspects of the universe, but these would have little bearing on our current perspective. Even so the most important aspect of our being is that anything that we can recognize or touch or feel or smell or observe is, by the very fact that we can do any of those, is a part of us, not an external sterile isolated thing, but a part of us. The only thing that is not a part of us is that which we can not see or touch or smell or perceive or feel. We are alienated by anything that is truly not apart of our existence, the exclusion is absolute, and incomprehensible. Still there are subjects, beings, entities and things within the constrains of our universe, that we do not touch, observe, feel, smell or sense because we are not given to experience their effects in an aware sensory mode. This is not to say that these things are not a part of us and that they do not exist, in fact they do exist, and are there; for regardless of our magnificent consciousness we are not, not necessarily intrusive enough to perceive the all encompassing emotion of “our” universe; and it is ours, more than you can imagine. The universe would certainly be less without us in it, though it could be made more by other subject representations, our particular representation is unique, not in its individuality, but in its universal perspective and composition. It may allow some personal gratification for you to know that the universe without a humanity, is certainly less of something; and again universes like to have a lot of a lot of things. It’s just their nature.
